Best Free Video Interview Platforms (2024)

I appreciate the asynchronous flexibility, allowing candidates to complete interviews at their convenience, making the process more accommodating. It significantly reduces the time spent on initial screenings by enabling us to review candidate responses on our own schedule, which has been a major time-saver. The user-friendly interface is excellent. We can brand everything, making for a professional presentation to potential candidates.

I bought Hireflix because we needed to screen a large number of candidates quickly. As the sole person responsible for recruitment, I required a tool that could handle initial interviews on my behalf, saving time and resources. Hireflix provided a one-way video interview feature that allowed candidates to respond at their convenience, which significantly streamlined the process and helped meet initially unrealistic deadlines. Automating the initial interview phase saved a lot of time and offered flexibility for both candidates and me. I have personally used Hireflix for two years, and it has been instrumental in managing high-volume recruitment efficiently, ultimately saving both time and money.

One drawback of Hireflix is its lack of real-time interaction, making it challenging to gauge candidates' immediate reactions to tricky questions. The platform only supports video questions, limiting the variety of question formats, such as text-based or multiple-choice options. The absence of scheduling tools can be a limitation for companies that require these features as part of their hiring process.

Hireflix is a lifesaver for urgent recruitment because you can send out questions to 20 candidates and get them all back simultaneously. The hassle of booking, scheduling, and rescheduling meetings is eliminated. The user experience is great, allowing candidates to complete interviews at their convenience without the need for scheduling. The platform offers unlimited user seats and interview responses even in its basic plans, providing great value for money. Its ease of use and intuitive interface make it accessible for both tech-savvy and non-tech-savvy users, which is important for many less tech-oriented positions.

When buying a tool like Hireflix, consider the user experience for both candidates and recruiters. Ensure the platform is intuitive and easy to navigate, which can greatly streamline the hiring process. Another key factor is flexibility; look for features like asynchronous interviewing that allow candidates to complete interviews at their convenience, reducing scheduling conflicts and saving time. Integration capabilities are crucial; check if the tool integrates seamlessly with your existing HR systems to ensure a smooth workflow.

Hireflix has added live chat and personalized onboarding, enhancing its value by making it more adaptable for different recruitment campaigns.

• Those who have high-volume or urgent recruitment needs
• Companies looking to save time and streamline their hiring processes through asynchronous interviews
• Organizations that value a platform that is easy for both candidates and recruiters to navigate
• Organizations that need a scalable and efficient solution for initial candidate screenings

It's really user friendly and easy to roll out to multiple members of the team. It has saved the team so much time, not having to phone screen has made the process smoother for everyone involved. With the use of video interviewing it means our hiring managers can start to get move involved in the recruitment process and make it a much more collaborative experience. The Willo team are ALWAYS on hand for any issues or questions the team may have.

We brought Willo to help us manage high volume recruitment, specifically at an early careers level. We have used it for over a year.

This is a tough one as Willo is so user friendly there aren't many cons. I suppose for us as a business we would like to see how Willo can explore more options to be used at a more senior level. Would be nice if when you press reject or accept comms was sent to the candidate.

Willo is by far the best tool I have used for video interviewing, for me it's so easy to use (especially for someone not very tech savvy) and means I can include more of my hiring team with recruitment.

Think about what they actually need Willo to do, where are their biggest pain points and most time consuming tasks. For us as a business we were spending a lot of time phone screening which is how Willo came to reduce time spent and gave us so much time back to be able to improve other areas of the process.

Willo has become much more diverse, with different languages being added, as well as features such as recording without video and text answers. This makes it much more user friendly for those who don't always feel comfortable with video interviews.

Businesses with high volume recruitment, as well as those looking to add a personal touch to their recruitment process.

SparkHire makes it easy for job seekers to record their answers at their convenience, reducing scheduling problems and speeding up the hiring process.

The platform has features that facilitate teamwork and decision-making, such as sharing interview videos, providing feedback, and rating answers. You can create interview templates with tailored questions for specific jobs, helping you better understand candidates' suitability for the role.

Our company invested in SparkHire to address several issues in our hiring process. Before SparkHire, scheduling interviews often caused delays and made it difficult to connect with potential hires. The interview process took longer for both hiring managers and job seekers due to the challenge of matching schedules, which extended the time to bring someone on board. We chose SparkHire to simplify and speed up our hiring process.

Their video interview system allows candidates to answer questions at their convenience. Once a question is ready and shown, candidates can record their answers when it suits them. This has reduced the paperwork around hiring and significantly sped up our hiring process. The option to share interview recordings helps hiring teams collaborate and make decisions more effectively.

I've been using SparkHire for over two years. During this time, I've seen significant improvements. The candidate experience has improved with video interviews, making the process easier and more flexible. The tool now includes key features like custom interview questions and the ability to rate and comment on responses, which helps assess candidates and identify the best ones.

The server can be very slow, causing frustration when retrieving results. The contact information provided is sometimes outdated or invalid. Some of the candidate contacts are no longer relevant or useful.

SparkHire stands out for its ease of use and extensive features for video interviews. It eliminates most scheduling issues by allowing asynchronous interviews, significantly speeding up the hiring process. Features like shared interview videos, rating systems, and commenting tools are more user-friendly and effective than those of similar tools, enhancing team collaboration and decision-making. The highly customizable interview templates allow for tailored candidate assessments, a feature many other options lack.

Ensure the tool is user-friendly for both candidates and hirers, with simple, clear steps for conducting interviews. It should integrate smoothly with your existing HR systems, such as your applicant tracking system, to streamline processes and avoid duplicate data entry.

Assess the functionality: Can you create custom interview questions? Can candidates schedule interviews at their convenience? Does it offer collaboration features and meaningful insights?

Choose a tool that can scale with your company's growth and handle an increasing number of users and interviews. Consider the availability and quality of customer support for resolving technical issues and answering questions.

The platform has seen multiple iterations to make its user interface more intuitive for both recruiters and candidates, resulting in a smoother experience. SparkHire now integrates more effectively with popular applicant tracking systems and other essential HR tools, bridging gaps in the recruitment process. Also, enhanced video sharing, more sophisticated rating systems, and improved commenting features facilitate better collaboration among hiring teams.

SparkHire is particularly well-suited for organizations that do high-volume hiring or have geographically dispersed teams. It is ideal for companies hiring frequently across time zones, as the asynchronous video interviewing feature eliminates scheduling conflicts.

• I like the interface and how easy it is to use; it’s very customer-friendly.
• The cost savings are significant, especially for administrative tasks and hiring managers.
• I appreciate that we can efficiently process a large number of candidates and fairly shortlist them, speeding up the hiring process and reducing costs.

The organization I worked for was in the banking sector, and we received a large number of applicants each time roles were advertised. Managing the administrative side of recruitment and shortlisting candidates took a lot of resources and time for hiring managers. We needed a solution that would enhance the candidate experience while reducing the time spent on shortlisting.

Recright was selected because it provides an interview-based recording process that helps hiring managers shortlist candidates while reducing the administrative burden. I used the tool for about three years.

• Initially, it lacked customization options.
• There were only standard templates, although they have since enhanced this feature.
• It took a while to integrate into our systems, being a bank, but this has improved with more integrations now available.

Recright provided exactly what we needed for handling the large volume of recruitments we do across various roles. We needed a tool that could be easily customized for different roles and locations, and one that could be used by all hiring managers and panel members to reduce the time they spent in the recruitment process.

Recright is ideal for larger organizations that recruit heavily. It is costly, so you need to ensure your budget can accommodate it, but it offers significant cost savings if you conduct over 50 recruitment campaigns a year.

The biggest improvement has been the enhancement of customization options. Initially, it had limited choices, but they have since added more features, allowing applicants to feel like the process is tailored directly from your company.

This tool is great for large organizations with over 50 recruitment campaigns and a high volume of applicants. You also need the capital, as it is more expensive than some other solutions.

I like that the Zoom platform is user-friendly and easily accessible through web or mobile apps. The reminders of upcoming meetings are extremely helpful for when I am zoned in and lose track of time. It has also provided us with the flexibility needed to remain hybrid and collaborate internally and externally.

Prior to 2019 we only used Zoom for virtual meetings. At the end of 2019 we transitioned to the full platform. When we transitioned we were looking for a more structured platform for our growing organization. We wanted something that was user-friendly for our staff and would allow us to communicate effectively. It worked out great going into the pandemic and already having a virtual plan.

One con to Zoom is the inability to fax directly from the platform. They have created an integration, but this requires an add-on feature that I believe is separate from the platform itself. Another con which is outside of their control is that it is internet based and if you don’t have good service your call/meeting may get dropped. (this is outside of their control)

Compared to the platform we previously used, zoom has more features and is easier to use. Being able to have our phone system and meeting platforms combined provides ease for our staff. Our staff can now use one app versus two which is what they were previously doing. Zoom also continues to come out with more features that are extremely helpful. Most recently the AI feature that provides a read-out from recorded meetings.

Think about the needs of your company and the budget. Consider the growth you are expecting within the year you are purchasing so you can get the proper amount of licenses.

There have been updates to the platform that have added more features. These added features have allowed us to save time on some of our processes. The AI features that are being added are truly showing that we can save time and be efficient as well as effective.

Zoom is a good platform for any size organization. When we first began using the platform we had 25 staff members and we now have 55. Zoom is able to grow with you to meet your needs.

I like the call recording tool where one can record the meeting and then get to share it later on with other members.

The language translation tool enables one to speak the language they're most comfortable with, and it can be easily translated to one's desired language.

Video conferencing enables me to have face-to-face meetings with my colleagues as well as the clients regardless of their physical location.

My organization bought Skype due to its large user base which can massively enhance its reach to customers and be able to provide more services. The most excruciating pain my company wanted to solve was the seamless communication not only among employees but the customers as well, regardless of their physical location. The video chats have made it possible to have face-to-face meetings from anywhere in the globe! It can be integrated into different applications for better collaborations in the company. I have personally been using Skype for more than 5 years now.

The premium subscriptions are a bit pricey, so they can have discounts and/or voucher codes used more often.

Call quality can, at times be so bad that one cannot hear or see the other person clearly. This is mainly due to poor internet connections. If this happens, one should consider other ways they can communicate.

Skype settings are times overwhelming for some of its users and they may opt for simpler communication platforms. Y'all can improve on this by making the steps simple, using different fonts and themes.

The biggest difference for me is that it integrates with other Microsoft products such as teams and outlook. It makes the experience better for us who use all these other Microsoft products.

1. Commutation needs. If they need screen recording, video conferencing or instant messaging then Skype is the best tool for the job.
2. Pricing. Skype offers both the free and premium version. One needs to decide what their budget is and what their needs are then be able to decide from there.

Again, call recording, transcription, and language translation have been a great evolution since one is able to communicate effectively and efficiently.

For a user, it's best for both personal and professional persona.

For an organization, it's good for all kinds of businesses, that is, small, medium or large enterprises.