10 Best HCM Software To Manage Your HR Needs in One Place

The mobile feature of this system is a great convenience for managers and employees alike, as it enables them to easily access on the go. The user interface is visually appealing and easy to navigate, which makes it a pleasure to use on a daily basis. In addition, the reporting functionality is simple and intuitive, and the customer service team is highly responsive and helpful in case of any issues or questions.

Our company was struggling with the hiring process and needed a more efficient and cost-effective solution than our current system. We needed a system that would help us manage job postings, resumes, candidate communication, and applicant tracking in one place. We also wanted a solution that would integrate with other HR tools we were using, such as our payroll system. Paycor provided us with a cost-effective and comprehensive solution that helped us improve our recruitment process and streamline our HR operations. It helped us save time, reduce costs, and improve our hiring outcomes. I have used Paycor for 3+ years.

I think the ATS function was better when it was under Newton, but since it was acquired by Paycor, it has taken some time to adjust to the changes. I also wish it was capable of serving larger organizations to compete with iCIMS or Workday.

Paycor stands out from its competitors due to its user-friendly interface, customizable features, and seamless integration with other HR tools like payroll systems which is why I prefer Paycor.

When purchasing a tool like Paycor, people should consider important criteria such as the software's integration capabilities, installation process, security features, customer support, available features, and pricing. These factors can help individuals make an informed decision and choose a software solution that best fits their needs and budget.

The beauty of using this system has been that you are grandfathered in from the time you purchase the tool. Which means as they continue to update the system with innovative functions they do not charge extra.

I think it's excellent for small to mid-size organizations

Rippling encompasses features for every HR component, including recruitment, payroll, HRIS, benefits administration, and engagement. The platform's user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate and use. Rippling's integration with other systems ensures seamless data flow and process automation. The comprehensive nature of Rippling's suite of products allows us to manage all HR functions within a single platform, enhancing overall efficiency.

Our organization chose Rippling to address the need for a comprehensive HR software solution that could handle multiple aspects of employee management. Prior to using Rippling, we faced challenges in integrating various HR functions such as payroll, benefits management, and time tracking into a single platform. Rippling provides a suite of products, including an applicant tracking system (ATS), full payroll and benefits management, time and attendance tracking, learning management, and professional employer organization (PEO) services. I have used Rippling for over a year and found it instrumental in streamlining our HR processes and enhancing overall efficiency.

The pricing structure lacks full transparency. Additional modules cannot be acquired independently; instead, the core Rippling Unity platform must be purchased first. Opting for the HR help desk feature, which includes phone and email support, incurs additional costs that escalate as more features are added.

I have not used other tools to know the difference between them and Rippling.

Rippling is a comprehensive HR platform designed to streamline and automate various employee management processes. Its extensive features empower users to seamlessly handle hiring, employee management, payroll, and training tasks. Beyond HR functionalities, Rippling also provides IT solutions for configuring and overseeing computer devices and application access. This platform is particularly well-suited for small to midsize companies, especially those with aspirations for international expansion.

I’m unsure of how WorkTango changed or evolved over time.

It is particularly well-suited for medium-sized businesses and large startups in need of a modern payroll platform.

I like the features of Ceridian Dayforce. It's a very user-friendly HR tool that our hourly employees can maneuver effortlessly. The system troubleshoots itself if there's an error.

Our organization was in need of a more user-friendly timekeeping software for our hourly employees located across various plants in our US campuses. We required a consistent payroll and time management system that could be seamlessly implemented across all offices. After exploring multiple HR tools, we ultimately chose Ceridian. The impressive functionality and user-friendly features of Ceridian caught our attention, allowing us to streamline timekeeping processes for all employees nationwide without any issues. Specifically, we opted for the Ceridian Dayforce version, and the transition to this HR tool has been highly satisfactory. In fact, we have enthusiastically recommended it to several partners and clients who collaborate with our individual plants.

Occasionally, the troubleshooting function of Ceridian can be somewhat perplexing when attempting to identify the root cause of an issue. In the past, we have encountered login problems where employees have had difficulties logging in correctly. Another minor inconvenience we have noticed is that when inputting time, the screen does not automatically display the current day but rather defaults to the beginning of the month.

Ceridian stands out as a highly user-friendly timekeeping software compared to many of its competitors. What sets Ceridian apart is its exceptional customer service, with its team readily available to address any inquiries or issues that may arise. Personally, I have a strong preference for Ceridian over other alternatives we have tested primarily due to its superior functionality.

The primary factors that influence our purchasing decision are the user-friendly nature of the software and its comprehensive features related to timekeeping. Additionally, the troubleshooting function performs effectively, even when dealing with a large group of hourly employees simultaneously logging in.

While I'm not entirely certain, I don't recall the HR tool having the troubleshooting function from the beginning, but I could be mistaken. It appears that Ceridian recognized the importance of addressing the timekeeping challenges faced by larger companies operating on a nationwide scale. They dedicated efforts to meet the specific requirements of such corporations and enhance their capabilities to effectively manage timekeeping across the entire country.

I think it fits larger organizations best.

There were several things I appreciated about Oracle. One attribute I appreciated was the simplicity of display on each page. There was not too much to sort through on each page that would distract or confuse me about what I needed to review or change. Another aspect I appreciated was the processing of transactions. The forms were simple, so processing was simple, and transactions would very rarely get "stuck" waiting on a particular user's approval the way it was implemented in our company. Lastly, I appreciate how the system would load quickly, and rarely was the system down, disrupting or delaying HR processes that needed to happen in a timely manner.

I worked for a Fortune 500 company that purchased Oracle PeopleSoft for their HCM software. I had used it for approximately seven years during my time there as the HRIS/HRMS system. My company purchased Oracle PeopleSoft with the intention to manage all People transactions, from pay, transfers, and all job-related information, in a timely and efficient manner. When you are managing tens of thousands of employees' data quality, ease of use and efficiency are key. The benefit of this system was having most of our employee data in one place for HR to manage employee information for the duration of the employee lifecycle.

There were a few things I disliked about the version of Oracle we had. It was limited to HR professionals to make changes to employees. For example, if HR was on training or vacation, managers were unable to make changes such as temporary upgrades or transfers. A second limiting factor was the lack of help tests. Without someone training you, you might not know how to navigate to the correct form you need. Lastly, Oracle seemed limited in its configurability options, so we had to use outside systems to manage all our HR processes (such as performance management ATS (recruiting)).

Oracle seems pretty antiquated to me and lags a bit behind the competition. While most HCM software is constantly evolving, the version of Oracle I used seemed to be a bit behind the competition. If I were deciding between various HCM systems, I would certainly add Oracle to my list to consider and compare for my needs, but I'm not sure it would make it to the top of the list for what we need.

There are a lot of criteria people should think about when purchasing human capital software. Cost, features, useability, tech support, and configurability are at the top of mind when considering unique business needs.

During the seven years I used Oracle at my company, I did not see much evolution. It remained pretty stable and served its purpose for that time.

I would say Oracle is a good fit for mid-sized organizations that are pretty stable (not in a high growth stage) and don't need a lot of customer support or configuration.

Workday is powerful, you can create almost any report and any feature that you can imagine (although, you need to know how to do it). Workday is scalable, you can do a lot in bulk. Workday is integration friendly, having an internal HRIS be able to integrate with other software is key to running smooth internal business operations.

Previously, we were using Gusto and BambooHR for our Payroll and HRIS sources of record. Gusto and BambooHR would not integrate with one another, and we were continually faced with "big company problems" using a "small company tool" like Gusto. Workday promised an all-in-one, scalable, and powerful tool we could use in order to meet our many Payroll and HR needs. We've been using it since January 1st, 2023, and I can say that it's definitely allowed the company to scale some work streams.

Workday is incredibly unintuitive, I wish it was more user-friendly. Workday doesn't have a support team and the Workday Resource Center is not super useful, I wish it had a support team we could call. Workday is very expensive since they hold a large chunk of the market and since it's difficult to move HRIS systems, they're able to get away with charging a lot of money -- I wish it was less expensive.

A lot more powerful, and a lot more scalable, but way less intuitive to use.

Don't purchase Workday if your company is small (0-500-ish employees). Don't purchase Workday if you're not struggling with scale.

Workday has allowed us to spend less time processing workflows that affect the end user, allowing for more automation, which means less risk, which means fewer errors.

Mid-size to Large companies.

It makes training compliance much easier for us. It is good for large enterprise environments. It is highly customizable.

My organization bought SAP-Success Factors to use as an LMS tool. We've been using it for about 4 years. Prior to using SAP-Success Factors, getting our large pool of employees to complete mandatory training was difficult. Now we can create our own training content and manage its delivery much more easily. It also allows us to track compliance on training more easily.

It can be difficult to get the support we need from our SAP representative quickly. It is so customizable that it can be difficult to predict the effect of small changes to the software. The integration with reporting can be slow.

Success Factors is very robust and highly customizable, and that differentiates them from competitors.

You should consider the cost, and it can be prohibitive for smaller organizations. It is also so customizable that you will need someone on staff to become an expert to really use it to its fullest. It's also good to consider if you actually need a product this customizable or whether something more plug-and-play would work better for you.

We are constantly meeting with our SAP rep to tweak our setup. They are willing to work with us on this, but it is sometimes a lengthy process.

Success Factors is great for a large enterprise-level organization that needs highly customizable software.

I like the ease of the search feature in UKG. The knowledge center is very helpful. I appreciate how customizable the platform is.

UKG was selected before I joined the organization. From what I understand, the goal was to streamline processes and utilize an employee-facing platform. While the primary focus was on payroll, there was also an interest in electronic forms and digital onboarding of new hires. I have been using the software for one year. During that time, I have converted many processes to digital ones.

The interface is confusing and not very user-friendly. Processes such as checklists do not make sense. The integration with other platforms is lacking. Data cannot always be easily extracted from forms.

I feel other platforms like Rippling or ADP are more user-friendly. Their interfaces are more intuitive and less confusing. However, I do think UKG offers better support.

The biggest criterion is ease of use for the end user, which includes both administrators and employees. Integration, file feeds, and overall system ease are also important factors to consider. Make sure the tool can seamlessly integrate with existing systems and workflows.

I have not seen significant changes over the year I have been on the platform. There have been small rollouts, such as e-verify, which have been added to our account for free. These features are nice but not significantly impactful.

UKG is suitable for small but growing companies and entry-level HRIS users.

I liked Sage People because of the simplicity of managing time card data. It is a very user-friendly system for beginners to learn and navigate. The seamless connectivity with our accounting software was also a major plus.

We acquired Sage People long before I was employed, so I can’t speak to the specific issues that needed to be solved before deciding to use it. We were previously happy with Sage 100 as our primary finance management service, which is how we came to learn about Sage People. I believe a primary reason for adopting it was to reduce paper consumption. We had previously tracked everything in employee folders, which grew beyond our storage capacity. I'm also sure it was intended to make it easier to manage a growing business with a rapidly increasing employee population.

Sage People felt a little dated for our growing business, not allowing for much customization in reporting. There was no employee self-service function, which required our HR department to handle all issues related to timekeeping, PTO, and many other things. We felt like we were outgrowing Sage People and ultimately looked for something that allowed us to manage talent digitally, including training, performance discussions, and employee reviews.

Sage People was a basic and cost-friendly alternative to many other HRIS systems on the market. For those that don’t need many plug-ins, it is a wonderful tool.

When looking to buy Sage People, the primary considerations should be how many functions you are looking for in an HRIS system. For companies that primarily need help with recruiting and talent acquisition, Sage People may not be ideal, as it has limited compatibility with other programs we use often for recruiting. Consider the size of your business as well—Sage People is well-suited for a mid-sized business with around 200-1,000 employees.

Sage People has definitely improved the user-friendliness of its interface and added some functionality that most HR departments look for in an HRIS.

I think Sage People is useful for small corporate offices or organizations managing a small workforce of labor-intensive personnel.